01 / On a schedule
Put a check on the clock
Nightly checks, weekly reconciliations, hourly monitors. Each run’s results land in its space, and the team is told.
/agents
Hand off the checks your team repeats. Get back a report with the findings, sources, and steps behind it.
Approved knowledge. Read-only by default. Every step logged.
check 2026 RADV diagnoses, flag what lacks support, report by 6am
Findings · delivered 2:00 AM
18diagnoses without support, by provider
01 · One agent, at work
See what it read, why it checked again, and what it found.
Reconcile March paid claims with the general ledger. Explain the difference.
Illustrative run · Demo dataDate cutoff mismatch
$12,400 falls outside the cutoff.
18 claims adjudicated March 31 were paid in the April 2 check run. The general ledger books them in April.
Read-only · source records unchanged
Run replay
Every step recorded.
02 · How it works
Agents start on a schedule, not a question. They read through the connections you approved, work in steps, and deliver the work with a receipt for every query.
Every night · 2:00 AM
SQL Server · claims_dw
Encounters
Provider master
1,284 tables · mapped
Work · Run 2a173 of 3 agents done
Pick a lane to see its receipt
Delivered · Run 2a17Risk adjustment
18 diagnoses lack support
9 queries · 12s · 0 writes · all logged
Receipt · Run 2a17
03 · Ways to run them
A few of the ways teams run them. Schedule the work, start from a question, or bring the agents you already use.
01 / On a schedule
Nightly checks, weekly reconciliations, hourly monitors. Each run’s results land in its space, and the team is told.
02 / From a question
An agent plans the question, runs it across your systems, and checks the answer. Save it, and it becomes a routine.
03 / Your own agents
Your assistants and internal tools read the same approved knowledge, so they answer from what your team agreed.
Access needed
This source is outside the approved connections.
The agent stops here and says where the data sits. This source was not queried.
CMS CAP risk checkScope
Illustrative example · Demo data
04 · Guardrails
A new bot can read its connections and change nothing. It reaches only what it was granted. More access is requested with a reason and ends on its own.
Asked for something outside its scope, it says where the data sits and stops there.
05 · It learns
Agents propose findings from their work. Approved findings join the knowledge your team shares.
Your team reviews them, or delegates review to an agent under rules you set. Each approval records who made it and when.
Nightly reconciliation
Reading claims.claim_line
Proposed pitfall
Reversed lines count twice in paid totals.
claims.claim_line · 214 reversed lines
Later run · 2:00 AM
Paid total, March
Waiting for its next run
Approved onceUsed by every run
06 · Questions
Read the connections in its scope, run its routine, check its work, and notify your team. A new bot is read-only by default.
It works on approved, time-limited access to the connections you grant it. Asked for data outside that scope, it says where the data sits and what it would need, instead of guessing.
Yes. Every query an agent runs lands on the audit trail, and each run’s report carries its queries, rows, and checks, so your team can test it against the source.
Yes. The assistants and internal tools you already run, and any MCP client, can read the same approved knowledge your team reviews.
They propose what they learn. Early on, a person approves each change; as proposals hold up, agents approve routine ones themselves. Every change goes into the knowledge graph with who approved it, and syncs to your Git repo for review.
Pick the check your team runs by hand every week. We connect the systems it needs and set it to run, read-only, with every step logged.